Randall Stewart wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:23:31PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote: >> >>> All: >>> >>> I am in the process of converting all the logging that >>> SCTP does to use the KTR sub-system. This will fit >>> nicely.. I still need to do some things to make it >>> so I can pull out the logs and make pretty charts and >>> graphs (in SCTP its used for debugging but also exploring >>> how CC and other niceties works).. >>> >>> But I was wondering.. would anyone mind if I took >>> KTR_SPARE2 >>> >>> and made it: >>> >>> KTR_SCTP_SUBSYS >>> >>> I have a huge amount of tracing under SCTP now.. so >>> many I am setting in a seperate mask set to enable/disable >>> various pieces of it.. So I was thinking it would >>> warrent a sub-system of its own :-D >>> >>> Any objections? If not I will change it :-D >> >> >> Yeah, we really do need to keep those spare fields for local use. >> >> Kris >> > Ok.. so I will just use > > KTR_SPARE2 KTR_SCTP would not be more appropriate? AttilioReceived on Thu Jun 14 2007 - 06:48:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:12 UTC