Attilio Rao wrote: > Randall Stewart wrote: > >> Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:23:31PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote: >>> >>>> All: >>>> >>>> I am in the process of converting all the logging that >>>> SCTP does to use the KTR sub-system. This will fit >>>> nicely.. I still need to do some things to make it >>>> so I can pull out the logs and make pretty charts and >>>> graphs (in SCTP its used for debugging but also exploring >>>> how CC and other niceties works).. >>>> >>>> But I was wondering.. would anyone mind if I took >>>> KTR_SPARE2 >>>> >>>> and made it: >>>> >>>> KTR_SCTP_SUBSYS >>>> >>>> I have a huge amount of tracing under SCTP now.. so >>>> many I am setting in a seperate mask set to enable/disable >>>> various pieces of it.. So I was thinking it would >>>> warrent a sub-system of its own :-D >>>> >>>> Any objections? If not I will change it :-D >>> >>> >>> >>> Yeah, we really do need to keep those spare fields for local use. >>> >>> Kris >>> >> Ok.. so I will just use >> >> KTR_SPARE2 > > > KTR_SCTP would not be more appropriate? > > Attilio > I internally had already done the #define SCTP_SUBSYS_KTR XXXXX so I can change it to whatever is appropriate... Of course when some enables the SCTP one it should be interesting to clash this against other sub-sys's. The SCTP on can (and is) used by researchers to be able to generate charts and graphs on cwnd algorithms.. and performance in various ways... thats why I thought a spare one would be more appropriate... but I can roll with the flow :-D If I get the scrubber programs in good enough shape I need to commit them into the test directory.... You can generate some really cool charts with it :-D R -- Randall Stewart NSSTG - Cisco Systems Inc. 803-345-0369 <or> 803-317-4952 (cell)Received on Thu Jun 14 2007 - 10:00:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:12 UTC