Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:14:28PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:44:48PM +0000, Darren Reed wrote: >>>> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:41:44PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>>>> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:54:45PM +0000, Darren Reed wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>> In another reply it was "hint.apic.0.disabled=1". >>>>>> My current loader.conf: >>>>>> >>>>>> vm.kmem_size=536870912 >>>>>> vm.kmem_size_max=536870912 >>>>>> unset acpi_load >>>>> acpi_load="NO" to disable the module >>>>> >>>>>> hint.acpi.0.disabled=1 >>>>>> hint.apci.0.disabled=1 >>>>> dunno what apci does :) >>>>> >>>>>> hint.acpi.0.disabled="1" >>>>> This is the one that should work. Can you confirm that you see it in >>>>> the loader environment by doing 'show'? >>>> ok. I modified my loader.conf to be: >>>> >>>> hint.acpi.0.disabled="1" >>>> vm.kmem_size=536870912 >>>> vm.kmem_size_max=536870912 >>>> vfs.zfs.arc_max=402653184 >>>> >>>> and now ACPI is didsabled when the kernel boots :-) >>>> >>>> Is it possible for parsing errors of this file to generate errors? >>>> And maybe pause for a few seconds so they can be read? >>> I guess all things are possible with forth. >>> >>>> When I was modifying the loader.conf, I was looking for errors on >>>> bootup but regarding getting acpi vs apci vs apic right, I never >>>> saw any. My experience also tells me that errors seem to quietly >>>> stop the rest of the file being parsed or...? >>>> >>>>>> # sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware="ACPI-fast" >>>>>> kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-safe >>>>>> sysctl: kern.timecounter.hardware: Invalid argument >>>>> kern.timecounter.choice >>>> When I tried to set this with sysctl, I got told it was read-only. >>>> The next step was to put it in loader.conf but now ACPI *is* disabled :) >>> Sorry, .hardware was the correct one. I don't know why you are unable >>> to set it at runtime: >>> >>> xor# sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=TSC >>> kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-fast -> TSC >>> xor# sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-fast >>> kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC -> ACPI-fast >>> >>> Kris >> I'm not sure why but it isn't settable with VMWare 1.03 server either. > > Maybe there are no other valid choices provided by vmware. > >> I gave the Intel ACPI one a shot though and I haven't seen any adverse >> effects.. yet. It is true that the higher the number, the faster the >> synchronization or the inverse? > > It's a "quality factor" that tries to estimate and rank the various > properties of time counters (higher = better). Basically sample rate? > KrisReceived on Fri May 11 2007 - 01:24:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:10 UTC