On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:24:18PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:14:28PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >>Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>>On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:44:48PM +0000, Darren Reed wrote: > >>>>On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:41:44PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>>>>On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:54:45PM +0000, Darren Reed wrote: > >>>>... > >>>>>>In another reply it was "hint.apic.0.disabled=1". > >>>>>>My current loader.conf: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>vm.kmem_size=536870912 > >>>>>>vm.kmem_size_max=536870912 > >>>>>>unset acpi_load > >>>>>acpi_load="NO" to disable the module > >>>>> > >>>>>>hint.acpi.0.disabled=1 > >>>>>>hint.apci.0.disabled=1 > >>>>>dunno what apci does :) > >>>>> > >>>>>>hint.acpi.0.disabled="1" > >>>>>This is the one that should work. Can you confirm that you see it in > >>>>>the loader environment by doing 'show'? > >>>>ok. I modified my loader.conf to be: > >>>> > >>>>hint.acpi.0.disabled="1" > >>>>vm.kmem_size=536870912 > >>>>vm.kmem_size_max=536870912 > >>>>vfs.zfs.arc_max=402653184 > >>>> > >>>>and now ACPI is didsabled when the kernel boots :-) > >>>> > >>>>Is it possible for parsing errors of this file to generate errors? > >>>>And maybe pause for a few seconds so they can be read? > >>>I guess all things are possible with forth. > >>> > >>>>When I was modifying the loader.conf, I was looking for errors on > >>>>bootup but regarding getting acpi vs apci vs apic right, I never > >>>>saw any. My experience also tells me that errors seem to quietly > >>>>stop the rest of the file being parsed or...? > >>>> > >>>>>># sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware="ACPI-fast" > >>>>>>kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-safe > >>>>>>sysctl: kern.timecounter.hardware: Invalid argument > >>>>>kern.timecounter.choice > >>>>When I tried to set this with sysctl, I got told it was read-only. > >>>>The next step was to put it in loader.conf but now ACPI *is* disabled :) > >>>Sorry, .hardware was the correct one. I don't know why you are unable > >>>to set it at runtime: > >>> > >>>xor# sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=TSC > >>>kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-fast -> TSC > >>>xor# sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-fast > >>>kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC -> ACPI-fast > >>> > >>>Kris > >>I'm not sure why but it isn't settable with VMWare 1.03 server either. > > > >Maybe there are no other valid choices provided by vmware. > > > >>I gave the Intel ACPI one a shot though and I haven't seen any adverse > >>effects.. yet. It is true that the higher the number, the faster the > >>synchronization or the inverse? > > > >It's a "quality factor" that tries to estimate and rank the various > >properties of time counters (higher = better). > > Basically sample rate? I think things like accuracy, query cost, stability. KrisReceived on Fri May 11 2007 - 01:30:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:10 UTC