LI Xin wrote: > Randy Bush wrote: >> could the em driver have been borked by the recent changes such that >> once a day or so it went out for a few minutes to an hour? if so, did >> the changes three days ago fix it? > What do you mean by "went out"? According to my understanding 1.175 of > if_em.c seems to fix the case where em(4) fails to attach on certain > hardware... running fine. stops moving packets for five to 60 minutes. starts moving packets again. all with no intervention, in rack, long way away. e.g. see two stops in http://rip.psg.com/~randy/070514.em0-borkage.png no other hosts with same symptom, though three with em ethers updated at same time. and, of course, it used to work fine until cvsup of May 8 12:03 (gmt). everything always "used to work." :) randyReceived on Tue May 15 2007 - 01:46:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:10 UTC