Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.

From: Kenneth Vestergaard Schmidt <kvs_at_pil.dk>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:17:37 +0200
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd_at_FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> I may reinstall at a later date as this is still very much a box to play
>> with, but I gather there is no great gain from going 64 bit other than
>> not having to play with PAE if you've got lots or RAM.
>
> I expect there is a huge difference in performance between i386 and
> amd64. I'm currently setting up environment to compare ZFS on
> FreeBSD/i386, FreeBSD/amd64 and Solaris.

I've had precious little time to do more testing on our amd64-setup, but
it seems that vm.kmem.size_max is a 32-bit uint, so we can't really use
much RAM for ZFS.

-- 
vh
Kenneth Schmidt
pil.dk support
Tręt af virusmails?
http://pil.dk/produkter/mail/antivirus/
Received on Tue May 22 2007 - 07:35:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:10 UTC