Re: size of kernel after gcc4.2 upgrade

From: Ivan Voras <ivoras_at_fer.hr>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 16:39:33 +0200

Stefan Ehmann wrote:

> Yes, but Ivan said he used default flags. So I think in his case the symbol 
> files are mainly responsible for the 106MB vs 26MB.

Yes, symbol files are 76 MB, leaving 31 MB for the kernel+modules.
That's not so bad.

Can anyone comment about will the symbols be useful in production
kernels, for better backtraces?

application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature

Received on Sat May 26 2007 - 12:39:59 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Steve Kargl: "Re: gcc memory consumption: amd64 v i386"
Previous message: Stefan Ehmann: "Re: size of kernel after gcc4.2 upgrade"
In reply to: Stefan Ehmann: "Re: size of kernel after gcc4.2 upgrade"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:11 UTC