non-functional backout for review

From: Andrey Chernov <ache_at_nagual.pp.ru>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:59:37 +0300
Some people complaints that new check in __isctype() is not human readable 
and requests for backout. Compiler gives almost identical code for old and 
new excepting non-optimized case where non-human readable one wins. I am a 
bit tired to change it forth and back, so ask for final consensus here.

Old one

return (_c < 0 || _c >= 128) ? 0 :

New one (requests for backout)

return (_c & ~0x7F) ? 0 :

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/
Received on Thu Nov 01 2007 - 02:00:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:20 UTC