Some people complaints that new check in __isctype() is not human readable and requests for backout. Compiler gives almost identical code for old and new excepting non-optimized case where non-human readable one wins. I am a bit tired to change it forth and back, so ask for final consensus here. Old one return (_c < 0 || _c >= 128) ? 0 : New one (requests for backout) return (_c & ~0x7F) ? 0 : -- http://ache.pp.ru/Received on Thu Nov 01 2007 - 02:00:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:20 UTC