Re: No libc shared lib number bump ?

From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander_at_Leidinger.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 22:00:09 +0100
Quoting Daniel Eischen <deischen_at_freebsd.org> (Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:05:48 -0500 (EST)):

> On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:

> > I'm pretty sure there will be future version bumps despite the assurances of
> > the "symbol versioning cabal" that there won't be.
> > So I think it should be left at 7 to allow that to happen in the future.

I have the "never say never" mentality, so I can understand your
opinion.

> Well, there shouldn't be.  But even if there is, there is 0.0, 0.1,
> etc.

I thought such minor versions are ... "bad" ... at least in our ports
we put a lot of effort to get rid of them back in the times when we
switched from a.out to elf.

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
... I don't know why but, suddenly, I want to discuss declining I.Q.
LEVELS with a blue ribbon SENATE SUB-COMMITTEE!
http://www.Leidinger.net  Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org     netchild _at_ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137
Received on Fri Nov 09 2007 - 20:01:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:21 UTC