On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Adam McDougall wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:45:49AM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:37:56PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > > OK, I've attached an initial patch that does this -- we still need to > keep > the lookup code for NFSv2, where the file handle of the new node isn't > returned with the reply, but I drop the EEXIST handling cases. Does this > look reasonable to you? I'm not set up to easily test this scenario, > however. > > Robert N M Watson > > I should be able to test this patch (or a later version) this weekend. > > Seems to work. I ran the original test case for several minutes without > error for over 2000 iterations. I only tested it on -stable by applying the > patch manually. If it is required I test it verbatim on 7, let me know and > I will. Thanks. This sounds good, I will go ahead and merge it to HEAD, then start on the MFC cycle. Thanks, Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of CambridgeReceived on Mon Nov 19 2007 - 11:42:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:22 UTC