That worked fine for us at netapp, don't know how well we're setup for the kernel specific bits. Also can we do what the rest of the world does and refer to it as x86_64 or 64-bit intel? Continuing to refer to it as amd (I know they came up with instruction set extensions but its now a fundamental part of the x86 ISA) only serves to confuse new users. -Kip On 11/25/07, gnn_at_freebsd.org <gnn_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > At Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:17:21 +0200, > Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote: > > > > gnn_at_freebsd.org wrote: > > > or vice versa? That is, can I do kgdb/gdb over serial from an Intel > > > box to an AMD box? > > Funny I'm about to preform similar task :) I'm going to try method > > described here: http://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2007/10/cross-debugger.html > > > > I should be trying this in the near future and will report results > here. I noted the cross debugger in ports, and I'm hoping I can use > that with kernel debugging. > > > Later, > George > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >Received on Mon Nov 26 2007 - 05:32:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:23 UTC