Jack Vogel wrote: > On Nov 26, 2007 2:31 PM, Attilio Rao <attilio_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> 2007/11/26, Benjamin Close <Benjamin.Close_at_clearchain.com>: >> >> > Attilio Rao wrote: >> > > 2007/11/22, Attilio Rao <attilio_at_freebsd.org>: >> > > >> > >> 2007/11/22, Benjamin Close <Benjamin.Close_at_clearchain.com>: >> > >> >> > >>> Hi Folks, >> > >>> With a recent current I'm now getting panics when em0 tries to >> > >>> come up: >> > >>> >> > >>> panic: mutex em0 not owned at ../../../kern/kern_mutex.c:144 >> > >>> >> > >>> _mtx_assert() + 0xdc >> > >>> _callout_stop_safe()+0x5d >> > >>> em_stop() + 0x50 (if_em.c:2546) >> > >>> em_init_locked()+0x47 (if_em.c:1256) >> > >>> em_ioctl()+0x466 >> > >>> ifhwioctl() + 0x75f >> > >>> ifioctl() +0xb0 >> > >>> kern_ioctl() + 0xa3 >> > >>> >> > >>> This is even after atillos, latest patch. >> > >>> >> > >> Yes, this is a race access to callout_stop() in em driver. >> > >> callout_stop() needs to be called with callout-specific lock held >> > >> otherwise you can get a race and this seems not happening. I just >> > >> inserted this assertions in order to catch bugs like these. >> > >> I have no time to double-check it, can you do? >> > >> >> > > >> > > Ok, basically em_stop() both wants to stop core callout and tx >> > > channel callout but it only holds core lock. It needs to hold both in >> > > order to stop both. As I'm not sure about lock ordering there I can't >> > > produce a patch now so the ball is in jfv_at_ court (CC'ed). >> > > >> > The attached patch fixes the panic at the cost of a lock order >> > reversal: >> >> jfv_at_ today should have fixed it. >> Please cvsup and try again. >> >> >> Attilio > > Yup, version 1.188 is the fix for this. > > Cheers, > > Jack > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" Is this expected after the fix? acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "network driver" 1st em0 _at_ /usr/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c:1018 2nd em0 _at_ /usr/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c:1252 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper(c0acd130,e6685a60,c07a6d26,c0acf51e,c40328d0,...) at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x26 kdb_backtrace(c0acf51e,c40328d0,c0a9becd,4e4,e6685a48,...) at kdb_backtrace+0x29 witness_checkorder(c40022d8,9,c0a9becd,4e4,38,...) at witness_checkorder+0x6d6 _mtx_lock_flags(c40022d8,0,c0a9becd,4e4,c4031800,...) at _mtx_lock_flags+0xbc em_init_locked(c40022c0,0,c0a9becd,3fa,c40ab400,...) at em_init_locked+0x65 em_ioctl(c4031800,8020690c,c40ab400,c0796b96,a057b1ef,...) at em_ioctl+0xe3 in_ifinit(0,c40ab400,0,0,c0ad68ef,...) at in_ifinit+0x292 in_control(c4300dec,8040691a,c422ea40,c4031800,c42ffcc0,...) at in_control+0xa83 ifioctl(c4300dec,8040691a,c422ea40,c42ffcc0,c42ffcc0,...) at ifioctl+0x333 soo_ioctl(c4297708,8040691a,c422ea40,c3f0d800,c42ffcc0,...) at soo_ioctl+0x3e2 kern_ioctl(c42ffcc0,3,8040691a,c422ea40,0,...) at kern_ioctl+0x253 ioctl(c42ffcc0,e6685cfc,c,c0afca45,c0b7b510,...) at ioctl+0x13f syscall(e6685d38) at syscall+0x2f3 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x20 --- syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF32, ioctl), eip = 0x2816b213, esp = 0xbfbfe60c, ebp = 0xbfbfe638 --- # em0: Link is up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex # pciconf -v -l | grep ^em -A4 em0_at_pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x61801462 chip=0x108b8086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'PC82573V Intel network controller (PCIE Gigabit Ethernet)' class = network subclass = ethernet em1_at_pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x61801462 chip=0x108b8086 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'PC82573V Intel network controller (PCIE Gigabit Ethernet)' class = network subclass = ethernet -- Mark Atkinson atkin901_at_yahoo.com (!wired)?(coffee++):(wired);Received on Tue Nov 27 2007 - 15:11:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:23 UTC