Re: Scheduler selection for web hosting

From: Claus Guttesen <kometen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 21:57:30 +0200
> 7-current amd64 is actually seems to be VERY stable on hardware and
> software we use, so, we want to move it to production servers and
> want to get max perfomance from it for web hosting.
>
> So, what is the difference between the two? Which seems to be better
> for hosting? Is ULE bugfree and stable enogh for this?

I'm using ULE on my 8-way HP DL360 and current as of Sept. 29'th.
2007. Works like a charm. Use ufs2 (rather than zfs atm.).

-- 
regards
Claus

When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.

Shakespeare
Received on Thu Oct 04 2007 - 17:57:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:18 UTC