On 06/10/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:00:13AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > On 04/10/2007, Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > There had been several complaints that nfe(4) with 88E1116 PHY > > > doesn't work. The attached patch may fix it by taking the PHY > > > out of powerdown mode. Because I know that some revisions works > > > well without any patch I'd like to know whether attached patch > > > have any effects for those hardwares that had been working > > > correctly. I think both msk(4) and nfe(4) would be affacted by > > > the patch so if you're using one of these hardwares please give > > > it spin and let me know the result. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Pyun YongHyeon > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > Pyun I am using Marvell 88E1116 Gigabit PHY but have had no stability > > problems with the unpatched driver in 6-STABLE. > > > > Would you apply the patch to stable and let me know the result? > There should be no regression for your case. > > > Chris > > -- > Regards, > Pyun YongHyeon > Sure ChrisReceived on Sat Oct 06 2007 - 00:17:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:18 UTC