On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 03:25:57PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote: > On 10/17/07, Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:28:01PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote: > > > > http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#license > > Google's not broken at all thanks... First hit for llvm-gcc shows the > following. > And, the first hit of llvm is the llvm home page. Read it and the FAQ link above and you'll find that llvm isn't derived from GCC. > Are dictionaries broken in your little corner of the net? I prefer my good old Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, which is sitting 2 feet to my left. That fact that the llvm project uses the GCC C/C++ frontends does not means that llvm is a derivative of GCC. -- SteveReceived on Wed Oct 17 2007 - 20:46:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:19 UTC