On 10/17/07, Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 03:25:57PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote: > > On 10/17/07, Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:28:01PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote: > > > > > > http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#license > > > > Google's not broken at all thanks... First hit for llvm-gcc shows the > > following. > > > > And, the first hit of llvm is the llvm home page. Read it and > the FAQ link above and you'll find that llvm isn't derived from > GCC. Already knew that. I was querying about llvm-gcc. Sorry that I was too terse to make that clear originally. > > That fact that the llvm project uses the GCC C/C++ frontends > does not means that llvm is a derivative of GCC. Yeah, I guess I was hoping that would have been inferred by my question about the parts that were derived from gcc. Still, I shouldn't have been so snarky in my comments back to you. But then I really thought you were asking for it with the google comment. Especially since I'm using a gmail address. I apologize for my terse, difficult to understand question, and my snarkiness. I hope you can accept that. I don't want to start yet another pissing match on a FreeBSD mailing list. :-) Dave PS: I actually do use llvm-gcc on Mac OS XReceived on Wed Oct 17 2007 - 21:21:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:19 UTC