On October 27, 2007 05:24 am David Taylor wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Freddie Cash wrote: > > On October 25, 2007 03:07 pm Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > But csup does not yet support CVS mode, so you can't use it to > > > maintain a local copy of the repository. For some people > > > (including me) this means that csup is not yet a suitable > > > replacement for CVSup. > > > > Maybe not, but for the bulk of the users of cvsup, csup is a drop-in > > replacement. :) As with most things in Unix-land, there's more than > > one way to do things, and every one will defend to the death their > > way of doing things. :D > > I think the point is there _isn't_ more than one way to cvsup the CVS > repo - csup currently cannot do that. Fine, to end the arguments: for non-developer, "normal" users, who only use cvsup to update their source tree for a normal buildworld cycle (and for the ports tree for those who haven't moved to portsnap), csup is a drop-in replacement for cvsup. There, does that make the lot of you pedants happy? :D -- Freddie Cash, LPIC-2 CCNT CCLP Network Support Technician School District 73 (250) 377-HELP [377-4357] fjwcash+freebsd_at_gmail.comReceived on Mon Oct 29 2007 - 16:47:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:20 UTC