Re: SCHED_ULE on desktop system

From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer_at_omnisec.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:59:48 +0200
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2007 08:49:56 schrieb Jeff Roberson:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm curious if SCHED_ULE is designed to be used on a desktop system. I'm
> > running -CURRENT at home and tried to use SCHED_ULE for some time. It
> > works alright while the load is not very high. But once I start
> > compiling something (running 'make buildworld' or 'portupgrade -a' for
> > example), the machine comes almost unusable - X11's windows takes a lot
> > of time to redraw, changing virtual desktop in window manager may take
> > a several seconds. And it's nearly impossible to watch some movie with
> > mplayer.
>
> Roman,
>
> This is contrary to the experiences of many others.  Can you send me your

Not in the UP case.
My i386-core2duo with SMP kernel gives _wonderful_ responsiveness, even, with 
buildworld -j5, I absolutely don't feel any slowdown!
But when I once accidantially installed a UP kernel,the machine was 
very "laggy", I want to say had short "freezes"

I'm also wondering that inserting a CF card in my card reader stops all io for 
a second. HALd is probably the culprit, but why can the system be stopped by 
userland? Maybe unrelated to ULE though.

Thanks
Received on Sun Sep 16 2007 - 10:00:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:17 UTC