Darren Reed wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Larry Rosenman wrote: >>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> >>>> Larry Rosenman wrote: >>>>> I'm a heavy ZFS user, and got the following panic on 2007-09-18 >>>>> source/world: >>>> >>>> This is a FAQ, please see the archives (you need to increase the >>>> vm.kmem_size to provide more memory to ZFS). >>> >>> I thought that was only for i386, and it hadn't been an issue before. >> >> Nope. It is also load-dependent. > > So I just received this courtesy of ZFS: > panic: kmem_malloc(131072): kmem_map too small: 343027712 total allocated > cpuid = 0 > KDB: enter: panic > > This was with these settings in loader.conf: > vm.kmem_size=419430400 > vm.kmem_size_max=419430400 > vfs.zfs.arc_max=409715200 > > (That's 400M, 400M and 40M, respectively.) > > Stupid question, perhaps, but is vm.kmem_size/vm.kmem_size_max limited > by physical RAM? Yes. KrisReceived on Sat Sep 22 2007 - 19:37:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:18 UTC