On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:28:36AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > You're all missing the point, I hate to say. What happened is that a > change was made recently to more accurately account for allocated > memory. Now people are getting kmem_map_too_small panics that weren't > getting them before. So while the accounting is now more accurate, > the outcome is actually harmful. That needs to be fixed before the > release. Agreed. A month ago I had zfs running perfectly on many different i386 machines (albeit with some tweaking to kernel parameters). With a week-old current, it always panics sooner or later now, no matter how low I set the ARC cache size or maxvnodes or how much I pump into kmem_size. Now kmem_map panics are being reported on amd64, which was pretty much unheard of before. If I can track down the exact change I'll just back it out of my local tree. CraigReceived on Fri Sep 28 2007 - 11:34:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:18 UTC