Craig Boston wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:28:36AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: >> You're all missing the point, I hate to say. What happened is that a >> change was made recently to more accurately account for allocated >> memory. Now people are getting kmem_map_too_small panics that weren't >> getting them before. So while the accounting is now more accurate, >> the outcome is actually harmful. That needs to be fixed before the >> release. > > Agreed. A month ago I had zfs running perfectly on many different i386 > machines (albeit with some tweaking to kernel parameters). With a > week-old current, it always panics sooner or later now, no matter how > low I set the ARC cache size or maxvnodes or how much I pump into > kmem_size. > > Now kmem_map panics are being reported on amd64, which was pretty much > unheard of before. FYI, no :) KrisReceived on Fri Sep 28 2007 - 19:44:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:18 UTC