Jack Vogel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Nikolay Pavlov <qpadla_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thursday 06 March 2008 01:35:43 Steven Hartland wrote: >> > Did you ever get anywhere with this? Did Jack respond? >> >> Nope. I've disabled tso. > > > I've looked into this a little, and then got interrupted with other issues. The > reason the thing is zero'ed is because the hardware is going to repacketize > this big wad that its been handled, it should be making new headers that > appear in the packets on the wire. So its not yet clear to me what the > real brokenness is, you are actually SUPPOSED to zero that value and > csum according to documentation, but the rewritten headers should have > correct len's in them, so the question is why in some cases they do not. I think packets on wire have correct IP-len, but after sending packet to card, driver injects original long packet with zeroed IP-len to BPF. So in tcpdump, we see packet with zero IP-len. vitaReceived on Thu Apr 10 2008 - 04:35:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:29 UTC