Li, Qing wrote: > Hi Hartmut, > > I appreciate your candid feedback. You raised many valid points. > I combined both of your emails in this reply, please see my > comments below ... > <snip> > > You are absolutely right. This was a complete oversight on my part. > I was telling myself "I think I am forgetting something". > ... then I remembered when the first port breakage report arrived ;-) > > To be fair though, I did send a message titled > "last call for L2/L3 rewrite code review" a week before the commit > to net_at_, current_at_ and all of the developers. > And I have sent many emails on this subject in the past few years. > > A couple of points I hope you could recognize: > > 1. The arp-v2 project replaces a major networking kernel design and > all of its dependencies that have been in operation for many years > (16+ ??). The networking kernel went through quite a surgery so > do expect things will continue to evolve. > > 2. This is the first time I am making such a major change in the > kernel. Since I am still learning the process, I am bound to > make mistakes but I will not repeat these mistakes in the future. > > My goal is to be diligent in monitoring the problem reports and > provide timely responses and fixes. > > And finally I want to thank you and others for your hard work in > helping me cleaning up the ports. > > Well, my mail was probably somewhat harsh, I'm usually more polite. You know, that's the kind of mood you are in after a couple of hours of useless work. Of course I appreciate your work and, I must say, you're an hero for taking this. In any case there is still an Todo on my side: the routing information for NETNATM is currently lost somewhere between L2 and L3 :-) I guess I come back to you in the new year to fix this issue... Have to fetch my ATM equipment from the corner where it is collecting dust to setup a testbed. In the mean time I will do an bsnmp import to fix the arp table problem. keep on your good work, hartiReceived on Tue Dec 23 2008 - 21:27:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:39 UTC