Robert Watson wrote: > ... > Do we have any of the necessary software parts to do simulated ATM > hardware similar to what if_tap does for Ethernet? Using the VIMAGE > stuff and virtual ATM hardware might open up the door to a more > accessible development and test environment. I did the NATM locking > work essentially "blind" due to a lack of test environment locally, > which seemed to work out, but a software test system would go a long way. Loopback would be possible, sure, but you are probably only going to be able to simulate looped-back PVCs. Fortunately, the ITU G.DMT mandated use of ATM for xDSL generally only uses PVCs. But for SVCs, forget about it. The really cute thing about ATM always was : the ATM Forum made end-station specs relatively freely available -- but, like X.25, the machinations of switching were left up to the vendors. ATM switch simulation is "another project entirely". cheers BMSReceived on Wed Dec 24 2008 - 16:26:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:39 UTC