Li, Qing wrote: > I don't think we can provide binary compatibility without putting > back RTF_LLINFO exactly as it was. My preference is to continue down > the new path without RTF_LLINFO. Out of curiosity, what's your reasoning for this decision? If I've missed this explanation previously, my apologies. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protectionReceived on Wed Dec 31 2008 - 06:09:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:39 UTC