On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:10:04AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:00:07PM +0100, Kai Wang wrote: > > Would it be better if we call them gar and granlib? Solaris did > > that. Also if I remember correctly, some ports probes gar. We also > > call GNU make as gmake... > > Why do we want > > I don't like "gar" as that is pronounceable to the point I could easily > see that being the real name of an existing program. Yes, you've got a good point. Actually I'm fine with either way... > Also, why do we want ports using gnu-ar specifically vs. what ever is our > native 'ar'? If our native 'ar' isn't up to the task, we shouldn't be > doing this endeavor at all.Received on Sun Feb 24 2008 - 17:56:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:28 UTC