Re: sbrk(2) broken

From: Jason Fesler <jfesler_at_gigo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:08:18 -0800 (PST)

> Also, may I humbly inject a user centric view here - it is pretty annoying to
> be limited to 500 MB of mallocable memory on 32 bit machines when you expect
> 3 GB to be usable (with 1 GB mapped to the kernel).

amen.  :-(   Has anyone tried upgrading a system from i386 to amd_64 
with any success?  maxdsize tweaks and reboots are disappointing at best.

Received on Thu Jan 03 2008 - 20:27:27 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Baldwin: "Re: [Fwd: Re: kern/118258 sysctl causing panics on 7.0-xxx]"
Previous message: Peter Schuller: "Re: sbrk(2) broken"
In reply to: Peter Schuller: "Re: sbrk(2) broken"
Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: sbrk(2) broken"
Reply: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: sbrk(2) broken"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:24 UTC