韓家標 Bill Hacker wrote: > JM2CW, but the level of 'traffic' on this list in re > still-experimental-at-best ZFS is distracting attention from issues that > are more universal, critical to more users and uses - and more in need > of scarce attention 'Real Soon Now'. > > It almost begs dismissal of ZFS posts to the bespoke list out-of-hand. > > ZFS is still eminently 'avoidable' for now. > > Reports of I/O problems, drivers that can corrupt data on *UFS* are a > whole 'nuther matter.. For my part it's because I'm "desperate" for a good file system, and ZFS seemed to be "it" for a while. I'd also settle for any other, including a stable version of UFS that's pleasant to work with on TB-sized drives (Sun's UFS? BLUFFS?), XFS, Ext4, LFS, HAMMER, whatever. I've tried contacting the author of BLUFFS, but without optimistic results.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:25 UTC