On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:06:55 +0100 Peter Schuller <peter.schuller_at_infidyne.com> wrote: > > That's it on my loader.conf and for months now I haven't seen a > > panic. Why should I or anyone else happilly running ZFS on i386 be > > denied of doing so? > > 100% agreement. > > If you want to go to extremes, require the user to put > zfs.zfs.run_on_32_bit_and_i_understand_i_am_an_idiot_and_this_is_not_recommended=1 > in loader.conf, or else have the kernel panic by design on boot. > > But don't make it totally impossible without patching the source, > *please*. > > Obviously the exception is if development for i386 stops such that it > actually does not work. But disallowing it for artificial reasons... > please leave things like that to proprietary hardware/software > vendors trying to squeeze money of out consumers, and leave it out of > a free operation system. > Just a note to put another '100% agreement' sign up. We have plenty of other FSes which are half-cooked and can easily hurt people, but nobody suggests removing them. Why ZFS should be singled out, it is in a way better shape than most of them. -- Alexander Kabaev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:25 UTC