-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > > > Just a side question... if it is so complete why was there a need to > > modify the orginal UCB version?... specifically there is no reason not > > to discuss improvements. > > The modification that happened was to remove restrictions. > What you propose is to add restrictions, which means that > it would be less free. That's a step backwards and will > not happen. Which are completely optional (adding options is always good)... as it currently stands it makes the situation no real option except for making the != in my signature into a == > > > If the root cause of the OP's issues is lack of interest in older code > > The OP's posting rather sounds like regression testing and > QA needs to be improved. Which are always unglamorous jobs and thus the least likelly to be done without some kind of reward greater then a pat on the back. - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Developer Tools. http://www.flosoft-systems.com Developer, not business, friendly. "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHhikpjRvRjGmHRgQRAvmZAKCzdLHoAgy5oNL66HKBBnhfJasFSgCgiW2V w7pBfhNhYrF3lqS5XYhgPTU= =nPho -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Thu Jan 10 2008 - 13:18:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:25 UTC