Quoting Poul-Henning Kamp, who wrote on Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:18:12AM +0000 .. > In message <47873174.4040802_at_gmail.com>, "Aryeh M. Friedman" writes: > > >> Ny scheme that depends on us changing the license is a non-starter > >> for both practical (we'd need to get everybodys acceptance of that, > >> and piss of a large number of users who have cleared the BSD > >> license with their laywers) and ideological (we don't want to > >> create uncertainty about the well known and deeply established BSD > >> license). > >> > >> > >The revision I am suggesting [...] > > It does not matter. The BSD license will not be changed for the > reasons I stated. > > It ain't gonna happen. > > All you're doing now is hurting your case by annoyingly keeping barking > up the wrong tree. Worse, it is hurting FreeBSD because it burns committer cycles that better be spent on doing something sensible instead of arguing about a license change that will never happen. Wilko -- Wilko Bulte wilko_at_FreeBSD.orgReceived on Fri Jan 11 2008 - 08:20:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:25 UTC