On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, David Schultz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> On Saturday 19 January 2008 07:13 am, David Schultz wrote: >>> For 8-CURRENT, I'd say go ahead and fix it and add the syscall >>> compat goop. Then I guess backport it to 7-STABLE after a while if >>> nothing important breaks and nobody has any objections to that >>> plan. >> >> Well, since the policy is 'no seat belt for -CURRENT', I think that is >> aceptable, too. > > Right, but you need the compat shims to avoid breaking the ABI > when 8.0 is released anyway. The compat shims should be committed at the same time as the actual change so that applications built on [4-7].x will continue to work. -- DEReceived on Mon Jan 21 2008 - 20:10:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:26 UTC