Re: panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held

Yar Tikhiy wrote:

> No doubt. :-) But the urgency of this problem appears much lower
> than that I estimated in the first place--fortunately.  Broken UFS
> would be a nightmare.

IMO if we're going to ship NTFS support in the base it should actually 
function, or at minimum not panic the box. As I reported earlier, I can 
panic my -current system with 100% reliability with fairly light access 
to an NTFS volume, which I consider to be a fairly large problem, at 
least for my personal usage pattern.

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection