2008/1/26, Doug Barton <dougb_at_freebsd.org>: > Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > No doubt. :-) But the urgency of this problem appears much lower > > than that I estimated in the first place--fortunately. Broken UFS > > would be a nightmare. > > IMO if we're going to ship NTFS support in the base it should actually > function, or at minimum not panic the box. As I reported earlier, I can > panic my -current system with 100% reliability with fairly light access > to an NTFS volume, which I consider to be a fairly large problem, at > least for my personal usage pattern. I'm not sure now, are you referring to some problems introduced by my patches or not? Thanks, Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. EinsteinReceived on Sat Jan 26 2008 - 16:18:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:26 UTC