Re: panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held

From: Attilio Rao <attilio_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:18:47 +0100
2008/1/26, Doug Barton <dougb_at_freebsd.org>:
> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
>
> > No doubt. :-) But the urgency of this problem appears much lower
> > than that I estimated in the first place--fortunately.  Broken UFS
> > would be a nightmare.
>
> IMO if we're going to ship NTFS support in the base it should actually
> function, or at minimum not panic the box. As I reported earlier, I can
> panic my -current system with 100% reliability with fairly light access
> to an NTFS volume, which I consider to be a fairly large problem, at
> least for my personal usage pattern.

I'm not sure now, are you referring to some problems introduced by my
patches or not?

Thanks,
Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Received on Sat Jan 26 2008 - 16:18:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:26 UTC