Re: Turning COMPAT_43TTY into a binary-only compatibility

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:34:19 +0100
"Julian H. Stacey" <jhs_at_berklix.org> writes:
> I'm too busy to review or help what you'r up to, sorry, but if your 
> changes are the way FreeBSD is going, I have hardware that uses these:
> 	/usr/ports/comms/gnokii	MAINTAINER=mad_at_madpilot.net
> 	/usr/ports/misc/estic	Port by me, MAINTAINER=dinoex_at_FreeBSD.org
> 	/usr/ports/sysutils/nut	MAINTAINER=Joerg.Pulz_at_frm2.tum.de
> & if necessary ?  I'll be able to test diffs occasionaly when necessary.
> (Hosts here run releasess & stable, but I could put up current when
> needed).

None of that stuff should be using sgtty.  Linux, for instance, only has
termios, not sgtty, so anything that runs on Linux must necessarily
already support termios, and it's just a matter of fixing it so it
doesn't insist on using sgtty instead.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no
Received on Wed Jan 30 2008 - 16:02:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:26 UTC