Re: puc(4) man page update?

From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck_at_rinet.ru>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 01:12:47 +0400 (MSD)
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:

MM> > doesn't splitting uart out of kernel broke serial console? Last time I
MM> > checked
MM> > it did.
MM> 
MM> Yes, it does. The serial console is setup/initialized and
MM> used before pre-loaded modules are linked and/or usable.
MM> We don't have the support in place that allows you to boot
MM> without console until pre-loaded modules are initialized,
MM> at which time add a low-level console device is setup.
MM> It's not that hard to do, I think.
MM> 
MM> So, currently low-level console drivers, such as dcons(4),
MM> sio(4) and uart(4) need to be compiled into the kernel.
MM> Consequently any devices/busses to which any of these can
MM> attach must be compiled into the kernel as well. Of these
MM> acpi(4) and puc(4) are good examples. acpi(4) is a good
MM> example because we use hints to work around the issue and
MM> have sio(4) attach to isa(4) instead...

Well, than, what is the reason to keep puc(4) out of GENERIC then? ;-P

Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer:                                 marck_at_FreeBSD.org ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck_at_rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Jul 04 2008 - 19:12:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:32 UTC