Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > somewhat generic implementation. each pru_xxx request loops back to > user space in a form of an event/message. such events could be > completely synchronous (blocking connect(), accept(), read() etc.) or > asynchronous (non-blocking connect(), etc.). each "loop" socket will > have either no or very little pcb associated with it - it will just > the socket's state. from user space each "loop" socket will be > accessible using its file descriptor and regular socket api and via > /dev/loopsock device node (or possibly create device node for each > "loop" socket). Not necessary the best way to do it in this case, but one approach would be to have some kind of "syscall diversion" layer, which would allow some/all syscalls issued by one process to be diverted for actual execution to another userland process. I am sure such layer could have other interesting applications. -MaximReceived on Thu Jul 10 2008 - 17:37:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:32 UTC