At 06:26 PM 7/25/2008, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >On Jul 25, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >... >>uart0: <Non-standard ns8250 class UART with FIFOs> port >>0xe500-0xe507 irq 10 at device 14.0 on pci0 >>uart0: [FILTER] >... >>uart1: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 >>uart1: [FILTER] >... > >There's no uart device found (i.e. probed and attached) at port 0x3f8. >So, there's no uart that can be associated with the console and you >won't have a /dev/cuau that is opened for/by init(8). But if I remove the modem, it does appear and work just fine. >>How can I force the PCI modem *not* to be uart0 so that the onboard >>com ports show up? > >uart(4) deals with the fact that the console may not be associated >with uart0, so the real problem is not having a uart driver for the >serial port at 0x3f8. > >>uart0: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on >>isa0 >>uart0: [FILTER] >>uart0: console (9600,n,8,1) >>uart1: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 >>uart1: [FILTER] > >Odd.. Is the 3com configured to take over COM1 or something? Nope, there is nothing that can be configured on it from what I see. ---Mike >-- >Marcel Moolenaar >xcllnt_at_mac.com > >Received on Sat Jul 26 2008 - 00:13:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:33 UTC