On Wednesday 30 July 2008 07:27:27 Ian FREISLICH wrote: > David Southwell wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 July 2008 08:45:45 Ken Smith wrote: > > > Normally the FreeBSD Project tries very hard to avoid ABI breakage in > > > "Stable Branches". However occasionally the fix for a bug can not be > > > > Sometimes information gets posted to this list on the assumption that > > everyone understand what the writer means. > > > > This is one of those occasions!! > > > > For those of us who are not as well informed and experienced as others > > could someone please explain what is meant by an ABI breakage, its > > implications and how to deal with them. > > Within a major release, the project tries very hard to maintain > Binary Interface campatibility, or stability. In fact as far as I > know, this is where the name "Stable Branch" originates. > > What this means is that a binary compiled on 7.0-RELEASE should > continue to work without needing to be recompiled over the lifetime > of the 7 branch. > > ABI breakage that Ken refers to here means that a change required > to fix a bug cannot be made while maintaining binary compatibility > with previous versions. Any program that makes use of (I'm guessing) > fcntl(2) or flock(2) that runs on 7.0, will not run on >= 7.1 without > being recompiled. > > Ian > > -- > Ian Freislich Thanks that is very concise and very helpful. Question is what is the best way to determine which programs (if any) depend upon fcntl or flock on a running system? DavidReceived on Wed Jul 30 2008 - 12:32:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:33 UTC