11 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN 1 25:08 96.19% idle: cpu1 12 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN 0 22:59 73.68% idle: cpu0 31 root 1 -68 - 0K 8K - 0 3:15 27.49% em0 taskq 32 root 1 -68 - 0K 8K - 1 1:05 8.15% em1 taskq It seems that the usage doesn't quite add up on a system thats just passing a bunch of data. The system shows 35.5% usage and only 30.2% non-idle. Which is likely to be more accurate? I'd assume the em0 and em1 usage numbers. Barney ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hsReceived on Mon Mar 03 2008 - 16:13:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:28 UTC