-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 is there any support is the Makefiles (for our FreeBSD source) for ctags? Beyond that, it used to be true that the ctags that resides in our ports was called Exhuberant Ctags, and the writer wrote it expressly for FreeBSD (at forst, now it seems to be GPL'ed), it used to be a great deal better thant hea native ctags, and is there any reason that I shouldn't use the Exhuberant Ctags? Now I gotta do something I haven't done before, which is figure out how to get cvs to ignore the changes I hack to the src/usr.bin/ctags makefile to remove the install target. This oughta be good for a laugh, as I try to see if I can blow away my archive. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHzEtRz62J6PPcoOkRAtf9AKCOencxDgbPWVHOyQRq/j1RZd02eQCfVIV9 mIg00Dve0aWyJ6DciI17G4c= =YC1w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Mon Mar 03 2008 - 18:08:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:28 UTC