Re: re(4) problem

From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:55:26 +0900
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 05:07:10PM +0100, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
 > Hello,
 > 
 > Saturday, March 8, 2008, 12:11:03 AM, has been written:
 > 
 > > Hello Pyun,
 > 
 > > Friday, March 7, 2008, 5:38:15 AM, you wrote:
 > 
 > >> I guess your issue is not related with bus_dma fixes but improper
 > >> handling of link state. Try attached patch and let me know how it
 > >> goes.
 > 
 > > The attached patch didn't help, the box is again in the same status.
 > > Can I provide you with some more detailed debugging info, or do you
 > > have some other ideas what could be fixed?
 > 
 > > I could probably manage a remote access to that box, but no remote
 > > console is available, and I don't know exactly how to trigger this
 > > scenario, but I think it depends on the amount of traffic being sent
 > > over the device.
 > 
 > If I won't hear from anybody in next 24 hours, I will have to replace
 > the network device in this box, in order to get it running properly.
 > 
 > However, I don't consider this step as a right solution and I would
 > rather better like to have it fixed in the driver.
 > 

Yes, I'd like to.
By any chance, does the system have more than 4GB memory?

-- 
Regards,
Pyun YongHyeon
Received on Mon Mar 10 2008 - 00:55:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:28 UTC