Hello Pyun, Monday, March 10, 2008, 2:55:26 AM, you wrote: > On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 05:07:10PM +0100, Daniel Gerzo wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Saturday, March 8, 2008, 12:11:03 AM, has been written: >> >> > Hello Pyun, >> >> > Friday, March 7, 2008, 5:38:15 AM, you wrote: >> >> >> I guess your issue is not related with bus_dma fixes but improper >> >> handling of link state. Try attached patch and let me know how it >> >> goes. >> >> > The attached patch didn't help, the box is again in the same status. >> > Can I provide you with some more detailed debugging info, or do you >> > have some other ideas what could be fixed? >> >> > I could probably manage a remote access to that box, but no remote >> > console is available, and I don't know exactly how to trigger this >> > scenario, but I think it depends on the amount of traffic being sent >> > over the device. >> >> If I won't hear from anybody in next 24 hours, I will have to replace >> the network device in this box, in order to get it running properly. >> >> However, I don't consider this step as a right solution and I would >> rather better like to have it fixed in the driver. >> > Yes, I'd like to. > By any chance, does the system have more than 4GB memory? Well it does have exactly 4GB. Attached, I am sending you the output of dmesg, pciconf and dmidecode utilities. The machine has been rebooted yesterday, but I haven't replaced (well re(4) is an onboard interface so better term would be disabled) the given NIC, but at the moment, it works fine. I suppose it will stop working in next 24 hours... -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger_at_FreeBSD.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:28 UTC