> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:24:33 -0700 > From: Sam Leffler <sam_at_freebsd.org> > Sender: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org > > Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > > On 18/03/2008, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> On Tuesday 18 March 2008 11:49:29 am Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > >> > On 18/03/2008, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > > First, which one is broken? Have you tried a RELENG_7_0 kernel and does > >> it do > >> > > the same as a release CD kernel? > >> > > >> > Tried both ISO image and RELENG_7_0, they both work ok, but RELENG_7 > >> doesn't... > >> > >> > >> Ok, and it is cpufreq related? Which cpufreq drivers are attaching to your > >> CPU? > >> > > > > Well, I wouldn't say I'm sure it's 100% cpufreq related, but removing > > it from the kernel fixes the problem... It's also possible that > > cpufreq is interfering with something else... Anyhow, I've got both > > est and p4tcc attaching. > > > > > I'm having lots of problems with cpu freq throttling on t4x laptops. > The system gets very sluggish and when I check the frequency it's been > throttled down. This happens even on ac (haven't checked what powerd is > doing then). Sam, As I have reported, cpufreq does not play well with the T43. I saw the same thing you saw. Pulled cpufreq from my kernel and it's working fine without it. This includes powerd doing its thing and a normal list of speed/energy values from 'sysctl dev.cpu.0'. dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2000/27000 1750/23625 1600/22600 1400/19775 1333/19666 1166/17207 1066/16733 932/14641 800/13800 700/12075 600/10350 500/8625 400/6900 300/5175 200/3450 100/1725 -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman_at_es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:29 UTC