Hi Kurt Jaeger! On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:25:56 +0100; Kurt Jaeger wrote about 'Re: unionfs status': >>> If you're using unionfs >>> to take a template system and "broadcast it" to many jails, you probably don't >>> want all the jails talking to the same syslogd, you want them each talking to >>> their own. When syslogd in a jail finds a disconnected socket, which is >>> effectively what a NULL v_socket pointer means, in /var/run/log, it should be >>> unlinking it and creating a new socket, not reusing the existing file on disk. >> This code's use in jails is primarily intended for mysql (and the like >> daemons), not syslogd (for which you said it right). Such daemons really >> require broadcasting, yep - so unionfs should support it... > Thanks for this description. So we basically have two different > uses for UNIX sockets in unionfs with jails ? > 1) socket in jail to communicate only inside one jail (syslog-case) > 2) socket in jail as a means of IPC between different jails (mysql-case) > Is 2) really supposed to work like this ? This is user's/admin's point of view, that it should work this way: one mysql with one socket for several jails. I don't know all gory details about how code really works. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight_at_mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]Received on Thu Mar 27 2008 - 05:55:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:29 UTC