On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Vadim Goncharov wrote: >> Thanks for this description. So we basically have two different uses for >> UNIX sockets in unionfs with jails ? > >> 1) socket in jail to communicate only inside one jail (syslog-case) 2) >> socket in jail as a means of IPC between different jails (mysql-case) > >> Is 2) really supposed to work like this ? > > This is user's/admin's point of view, that it should work this way: one > mysql with one socket for several jails. I don't know all gory details about > how code really works. As I see it, nullfs should provide a shared socket, it is intended to provide access to the same object, and unionfs should provide independent sockets, as unionfs is intended to provide isolation. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of CambridgeReceived on Thu Mar 27 2008 - 12:56:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:29 UTC