On Wed, 7 May 2008, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Tue, 6 May 2008, Michael Proto wrote: > > MP>Mike Tancsa wrote: > MP>> At 08:55 PM 5/6/2008, Michael Proto wrote: > MP>> > Is anyone seeing problems with bsnmpd reporting an incorrect > MP>> > HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad value under HEAD? I'm using the > MP>> > default /etc/snmpd.config settings and am loading the > MP>> > /usr/lib/snmp_hostres.so library just as I do in 6.3, but the value for > MP>> > this MIB always reports CPU utilization at 100% regardless of the actual > MP>> > load on the system. 6.3 and 6-STABLE both work correctly and report the > MP>> > actual CPU utilization when queried. > MP>> > MP>> IIRC, I noticed this when I changed to ULE from 4BSD_SCHED. > MP>> > MP>> ---Mike > MP> > MP>Would match my environment as well, as I'm using ULE on all of the > MP>affected systems. Just built a 4BSD kernel on my HEAD system and > MP>HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad reports a correct value again. > MP> > MP>Anyone have an idea on a fix? > > If anybody has a fix that works with both schedulers, I happily commit > this. The problem as dwhite told syrinx and I found out it that ccpu is 0 for ULE and there is a return 0.0 for that case. The problem is that after removing that patch I see "something". Pinning my a.out to the 2nd of my 2 single core opterons, top reports CPU 1 100% a.out but snmp says 0 even if I leave that runnign for a few minutes. I am not sure if hostres is doing it all correct, nor am I sure sched_ule.c/kern_proc.c are right. This needs more investigation. Either syrinx or I will have a look. Worst I'll try to catch Jeff. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.Received on Wed May 07 2008 - 12:44:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:30 UTC