On Wed 07 May, 2008, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Tue, 6 May 2008, Michael Proto wrote: > > MP>Mike Tancsa wrote: > MP>> At 08:55 PM 5/6/2008, Michael Proto wrote: > MP>> > Is anyone seeing problems with bsnmpd reporting an incorrect > MP>> > HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad value under HEAD? I'm using the > MP>> > default /etc/snmpd.config settings and am loading the > MP>> > /usr/lib/snmp_hostres.so library just as I do in 6.3, but the value for > MP>> > this MIB always reports CPU utilization at 100% regardless of the actual > MP>> > load on the system. 6.3 and 6-STABLE both work correctly and report the > MP>> > actual CPU utilization when queried. > MP>> > MP>> IIRC, I noticed this when I changed to ULE from 4BSD_SCHED. > MP>> > MP>> ---Mike > MP>> _______________________________________________ > MP>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > MP>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > MP>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > MP> > MP>Would match my environment as well, as I'm using ULE on all of the > MP>affected systems. Just built a 4BSD kernel on my HEAD system and > MP>HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad reports a correct value again. > MP> > MP>Anyone have an idea on a fix? > > If anybody has a fix that works with both schedulers, I happily commit > this. Here you are :) --- hostres_processor_tbl.c.old 2008-05-07 17:23:47.000000000 +0700 +++ hostres_processor_tbl.c 2008-05-07 17:23:54.000000000 +0700 _at__at_ -120,7 +120,7 _at__at_ static double processor_getpcpu(struct kinfo_proc *ki_p) { - if (ccpu == 0 || fscale == 0) + if (fscale == 0) return (0.0); #define fxtofl(fixpt) ((double)(fixpt) / fscale) -- Stanislav Svirid > Siberian Networks, Novosibirsk, Russia > SAS-RIPE, 3909675_at_ICQReceived on Wed May 07 2008 - 08:47:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:30 UTC