Martin Cracauer wrote: > Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote on Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 08:38:00PM -0500: >> I have a dual core amd64 on which I run a processor intensive numerical >> program. I had been frustrated because it seemed to run 3 or 4 times >> faster under Linux. But with a recent upgrade of FreeBSD-CURRENT, it >> now goes at about the same speed as Linux. > > Are the threads meant to provide additional CPU resources or help with > concurrency/IO issues? They are meant to provide additional CPU resources. > > Do you create a lot of new threads on the fly? > No. They are synchronized via standard pthread_cond type constructions... > What kind of worker model do you have there? > ... and each thread is a loop of the form while (1) { wait until told to start; do massive amounts of floating point arithmetic (only additions and multiplications) on large arrays; tell the master process that you are done; } > Do you have about as many threads as processor or more? Both ways. The time difference between the two approaches is negligible. > > How malloc intensive is it? All mallocs are done one time at the beginning. > > MartinReceived on Mon Sep 15 2008 - 22:36:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:35 UTC