Re: is there a protected/locked printf?

From: Dimitry Andric <dimitry_at_andric.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:20:03 +0100

On 2009-02-08 18:31, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> Its taking me all day to figure out something that should take 5 minutes
> if I could get printf to not print garbage. Is there a mulitcore version
> of printf that isn't completely useless for use for trace code?

Add:

options		PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=128

to your kernel config file, that might help.

Received on Sun Feb 08 2009 - 17:20:22 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Remko Lodder: "Re: HEADSUP usb2/usb4bsd to become default in GENERIC"
Previous message: Barney Cordoba: "is there a protected/locked printf?"
In reply to: Barney Cordoba: "is there a protected/locked printf?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:41 UTC